TranscribeCat vs Sonix
For a straightforward AI transcript, TranscribeCat is $2/hour with no subscription. Sonix is the better tool if you need its built-in translation or collaborative transcript editor — features that put its price at $10/hr pay-per-use or $22/month.
Founder · Building TranscribeCat since 2024 · Last updated May 2, 2026
| TranscribeCat | Sonix | |
|---|---|---|
| 料金 | $2/時間 | $10/hr or $22/mo subscription |
| サブスク必須 | いいえ | Optional ($22/mo plan) |
| 音声 5 時間の費用 | $10 | $50 (pay-per-use) |
| 話者ラベル | はい | はい |
| 言語 | 100 以上を自動検出 | 49+ |
| 翻訳機能内蔵 | いいえ | はい |
| エクスポート形式 | TXT, SRT, VTT | Many (SRT, VTT, TXT, DOCX, PDF) |
| ブラウザ内エディタ | いいえ | はい |
| 自動字幕 | はい | はい |
| 最大ファイル長 | 10 時間 | プランによる |
| 音声の保存期間 | 最終ログインから 90 日間保持 | No (stored in cloud) |
| 最適な用途 | Simple, affordable transcripts | Media companies needing translation |
When to choose TranscribeCat over Sonix
Sonix is a feature-rich platform built for media companies — it includes built-in translation, a collaborative transcript editor, and a wide range of export formats. If you need to transcribe, translate, and distribute content across formats, Sonix is a solid choice.
But all those features come at 5x the cost. If you just need accurate transcripts from audio or video files — without translation or a built-in editor — TranscribeCat does the job at $2/hr instead of $10/hr. No subscription, no bloated feature set.
For a freelancer transcribing 5 hours of interviews, TranscribeCat costs $10 total vs $50 with Sonix. That's $40 saved on a single project.
For teams: one shared card, no per-seat tier
Sonix charges per seat for collaboration features. TranscribeCat takes a different approach: create an organization, save one card on it, and invite teammates. Every upload by any member is charged to that single card at $2/hour. No seats to provision; members never see a payment screen.
See the team-pricing breakdown for the math at 5, 10, and 25 seats.
Per-minute math: $2 vs $10 per hour
Sonix charges $10/hour, which works out to $0.167 per minute. TranscribeCat charges $2/hour — $0.033 per minute. That's exactly 5× cheaper for output that's functionally equivalent: AI transcription, speaker labels, 100+ languages, SRT and Word export, similar accuracy ranges.
Concrete monthly examples: a podcaster who transcribes 8 episodes (~6 hours total) pays $60 on Sonix, $12 on TranscribeCat — a $48/month difference, $576/year. A graduate student transcribing 30 hours of interviews for a dissertation pays $300 vs $60 — a $240 swing on a one-time project. A meetings team archiving 40 hours of weekly recordings pays $400/month on Sonix vs $80 on TranscribeCat — close to $4,000/year.
The features Sonix bundles into the higher rate (collaborative editor, automated translation, custom vocabulary lists) are real, just not necessary for most use cases. If you need them, Sonix earns the premium. If you don't, $2/hr is the answer.
関連する比較を見る
サブスク不要